Practical answers before we scope.

Composition mapping & architecture review, Vyper 0.4 migration sprints, invariant-first security reviews, DeFi protocol architecture, and deploy-gate/watchtower setup for protocol teams.

No external audit is claimed. My stack is self-reviewed, stateful-fuzzed, fork-tested where practical, and internally composition-reviewed. That helps prepare for an independent audit — it does not replace one.

Yes, with explicit scope, key custody, deployment, and verification procedures. The KhomDev public stack shown here is Sepolia/testnet scale with no mainnet TVL.

Typical ranges: composition mapping $2k–$5k, Vyper migration from $9k, invariant-first review from $3k, protocol architecture from $12k, deploy gate/watchtower $4k setup or $500–$1.5k/month. Fractional retainer from $6k/month.

Fixed scope, fixed price, settled in USDC (Request Finance or Coinbase Commerce). 50% to start, 50% on delivery. Engagements over $5k can run through a Safe multisig with a neutral signer or Kleros escrow.

Vyper's smaller surface area and explicitness remove whole classes of bugs, and it's the native language of the Curve ecosystem. Few engineers specialize in it — that scarcity is why teams bring me in.

Reviews in days, integrations in 1–2 weeks, full builds in weeks. Every engagement is scoped to a fixed timeline before work starts. 24h reply on inquiries.

Products are self-serve Vyper blueprint packages — educational/reference, self-reviewed, not audited. Services are custom work on your codebase, architecture, deployment, or review process.

No. The security agents are deterministic and read-only unless specifically documented otherwise. They verify, diff, monitor, simulate, and report. They do not execute transactions or hold keys.

Yes — you work directly with the engineer who writes the code. Escrow and milestone delivery keep larger engagements low-risk.